technician: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
is paid low 0.90
is pay 0.88
is hourly pay 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(technician, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(technician, is paid low)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(technician, is pay)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(technician, is paid low)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(technician, is pay)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technician, is pay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(technician, is paid low)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(technician, is hourly pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(technician, is hourly pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(technician, is pay)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(technician, is paid low)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(technician, is hourly pay)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(technician, is hourly pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technician, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(technician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(technician, is paid)