technology: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful 0.99
be harmful to people 0.95
be dangerous to humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(technology, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(technology, be harmful)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(technology, be harmful)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(technology, be harmful)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(technology, be harmful)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful to people)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(technology, be harmful to people)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(technology, be harmful)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(technology, be harmful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(technology, be harmful to people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(technology, be harmful to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(technology, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(technology, is harmful)