ted: was well respected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.55
, source
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, dan
Weight: 0.33
, ac
Weight: 0.32
, annie
Weight: 0.32
, sarah
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was well respected 1.00
was respected 0.97
was kennedy well respected 0.89
was kennedy respected 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ted, was well respected)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ted, was respected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ted, was respected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ted, was respected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ted, was kennedy well respected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ted, was kennedy well respected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ted, was kennedy well respected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ted, was kennedy respected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ted, was kennedy respected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ted, was kennedy respected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ted, was kennedy well respected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ted, was respected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ted, was kennedy respected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ted, was well respected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(ted, was well respected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ted, was well respected)