telemarketer: call people

Related concepts

Parents	caller Weight: 0.57 , third party Weight: 0.56 , business Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.50
Siblings	barber shop Weight: 0.31 , florist Weight: 0.31 , creditor Weight: 0.31 , spammer Weight: 0.31 , business card Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
call people	1.00
call nothing	0.81
keep calling	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(caller, keep calling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(telemarketer, call people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(caller, keep calling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(caller, keep calling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(caller, keep calling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(telemarketer, call people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(telemarketer, call people)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, call nothing)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(telemarketer, call nothing)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, keep calling)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(telemarketer, call nothing)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(telemarketer, call nothing)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(telemarketer, keep calling)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(telemarketer, keep calling)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(telemarketer, keep calling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, call people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(telemarketer, call people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(caller, keep calling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(telemarketer, call people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(caller, keep calling)