telemarketer: has telephone script

Related concepts

Parents	caller Weight: 0.57 , people Weight: 0.54 , business Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.50
Siblings	barber shop Weight: 0.31 , receptionist Weight: 0.31 , salesman Weight: 0.31 , office worker Weight: 0.31 , young person Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has telephone script	1.00
answer telephone	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(receptionist, answer telephone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(receptionist, answer telephone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(receptionist, answer telephone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(telemarketer, has telephone script)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, has telephone script)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(telemarketer, has telephone script)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, has telephone script) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(receptionist, answer telephone)