telephone box: be at london

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.54
Siblings telephone booth
Weight: 0.33
, post office
Weight: 0.33
, doctor office
Weight: 0.31
, convenience store
Weight: 0.31
, dental office
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at london 1.00
be at england 0.82
be at germany 0.77
be at michigan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(telephone booth, be at london)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dental office, be at michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(doctor office, be at germany)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(telephone booth, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(telephone booth, be at london)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(doctor office, be at germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(doctor office, be at germany)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dental office, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(dental office, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(telephone box, be at london)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(telephone box, be at england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(telephone box, be at england)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at england)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(telephone box, be at england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(telephone box, be at london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(telephone booth, be at london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(doctor office, be at germany)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone box, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dental office, be at michigan)