telephone: be at internet cafe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.59
, terminal
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, modem
Weight: 0.33
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet cafe 1.00
be used to use internet 0.82
be used to connect to internet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(modem, be used to connect to internet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(modem, be used to connect to internet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(modem, be used to connect to internet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(telephone, be at internet cafe)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(telephone, be used to use internet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(telephone, be used to use internet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be used to use internet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(telephone, be used to use internet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at internet cafe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(telephone, be at internet cafe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(modem, be used to connect to internet)