telephone: be at on desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.59
, terminal
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, modem
Weight: 0.33
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at on desk 1.00
be at on your desk 0.97
be more expensive than desk top computer 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(telephone, be at on desk)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at on your desk)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(telephone, be at on your desk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(telephone, be at on your desk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(telephone, be at on your desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at on desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(telephone, be at on desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)