telephone: be good form of communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good form of communication 1.00
help communication 0.89
affect communication 0.87
improve communication 0.86
improve communication for individual 0.85
improve communication in workplace 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, help communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, affect communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mobile phone, help communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, help communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mobile phone, affect communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, affect communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication for individual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(telephone, be good form of communication)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(telephone, improve communication in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(telephone, improve communication in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(telephone, improve communication in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(telephone, improve communication in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(telephone, be good form of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mobile phone, affect communication)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mobile phone, help communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be good form of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication for individual)