telephone: be in use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in use 1.00
be in use now 0.92
has quality use 0.83
be in poptropica 0.78
be in melboure 0.78
be used in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be in poptropica)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be in melboure)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mobile phone, be in melboure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be in melboure)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(mobile phone, be in poptropica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be in poptropica)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(telephone, be in use)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use now)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(telephone, be in use now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be used in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(telephone, be in use now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(telephone, be in use now)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(telephone, be used in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(telephone, be used in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(telephone, be used in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(telephone, be in use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be in melboure)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be in use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be in poptropica)