telephone: have magnets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have magnets 1.00
use magnets 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(device, use magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(telephone, have magnets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(device, use magnets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(device, use magnets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(device, use magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(telephone, have magnets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(telephone, have magnets)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(telephone, use magnets)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(telephone, use magnets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(telephone, use magnets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(telephone, use magnets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(telephone, have magnets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(telephone, have magnets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(device, use magnets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(telephone, have magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(device, use magnets)