telescope: be at in observatory

Related concepts

Parents	instrument Weight: 0.69 , device Weight: 0.62 , technology Weight: 0.59 , object Weight: 0.57
Siblings	comet Weight: 0.35 , laser Weight: 0.34 , projector Weight: 0.34 , spectrophotometer Weight: 0.34 , musical instrument Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at in observatory	1.00
wants to look through telescope	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(comet, wants to look through telescope)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(comet, wants to look through telescope) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(comet, wants to look through telescope)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(telescope, be at in observatory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(telescope, be at in observatory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(telescope, be at in observatory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(telescope, be at in observatory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(comet, wants to look through telescope)