telescope: be very useful to scientist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio telescope
Weight: 0.39
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very useful to scientist 1.00
be important to scientists 0.81
help scientists 0.78
be useful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laser, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laser, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(laser, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(telescope, be very useful to scientist)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(telescope, be important to scientists)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important to scientists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(telescope, be important to scientists)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(telescope, be useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important to scientists)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(laser, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(telescope, be very useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)