telescope: have larger than other types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio telescope
Weight: 0.39
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have larger than other types 1.00
be different 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(comet, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(comet, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(comet, be different)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(telescope, have larger than other types)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(telescope, be different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(telescope, be different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(telescope, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(telescope, have larger than other types)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(comet, be different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(telescope, have larger than other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be different)