telescope: is very expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio telescope
Weight: 0.39
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is very expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(telescope, is very expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(instrument, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(telescope, is very expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(telescope, is very expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(telescope, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(telescope, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(telescope, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(telescope, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(telescope, is very expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(telescope, is very expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(telescope, is very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)