television: has state media

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state media 1.00
be important form of mass media 0.82
is effective media 0.82
is most effective media 0.80
be becomes media 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be important form of mass media)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be important form of mass media)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(radio, be important form of mass media)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(television, has state media)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(television, is most effective media)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(television, is most effective media)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(television, is most effective media)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(television, is most effective media)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(television, has state media)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(television, has state media)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(television, has state media)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be important form of mass media)