teller: be find at bank

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.56
, magician
Weight: 0.53
, people
Weight: 0.52
, employee
Weight: 0.50
, scientist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cashier
Weight: 0.32
, receptionist
Weight: 0.32
, salesperson
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find at bank 1.00
be at bank 0.95
be at in bank 0.94
be find in restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(waiter, be find in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(teller, be find at bank)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(teller, be at bank)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(teller, be at in bank)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(teller, be at in bank)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(teller, be at bank)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(teller, be at bank)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(teller, be at in bank)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(teller, be at bank)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(teller, be at in bank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(teller, be find at bank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(teller, be find at bank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(teller, be find at bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waiter, be find in restaurant)