ten: be base for scientific notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents number
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.47
, age
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, team
Weight: 0.46
Siblings five
Weight: 0.34
, eleven
Weight: 0.33
, nine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be base for scientific notation 1.00
be used in scientific notation 0.94
be base for notation 0.94
be used in notation 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ten, be base for scientific notation)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ten, be base for notation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ten, be used in scientific notation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ten, be used in scientific notation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ten, be base for notation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ten, be base for notation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ten, be base for notation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ten, be used in scientific notation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ten, be used in notation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ten, be used in notation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ten, be used in scientific notation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ten, be used in notation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ten, be used in notation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ten, be base for scientific notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ten, be base for scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ten, be base for scientific notation)