ten: be written in numerals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents number
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.47
, age
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, team
Weight: 0.46
Siblings five
Weight: 0.34
, eleven
Weight: 0.33
, nine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be written in numerals 1.00
be to power written as decimal 0.78
written as decimal 0.77
be to second power written as decimal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ten, be written in numerals)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ten, written as decimal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ten, be to power written as decimal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ten, be to second power written as decimal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ten, be to power written as decimal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ten, be to second power written as decimal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(ten, written as decimal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ten, be to second power written as decimal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ten, be to power written as decimal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ten, be to power written as decimal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ten, written as decimal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ten, be to second power written as decimal)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ten, written as decimal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ten, be written in numerals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ten, be written in numerals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ten, be written in numerals)