tenderloin: be vs filet mignon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loin
Weight: 0.59
, entree
Weight: 0.58
, cut
Weight: 0.54
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, pork
Weight: 0.52
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.36
, ravioli
Weight: 0.35
, salad
Weight: 0.35
, lasagna
Weight: 0.34
, chicken
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs filet mignon 1.00
be vs filet 0.98
be vs mignon 0.92
be called tenderloin 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(neighborhood, be called tenderloin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(neighborhood, be called tenderloin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(neighborhood, be called tenderloin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(neighborhood, be called tenderloin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be called tenderloin)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be vs mignon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be called tenderloin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, be vs mignon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be vs mignon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tenderloin, be called tenderloin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs mignon)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be called tenderloin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(neighborhood, be called tenderloin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tenderloin, be vs filet mignon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(neighborhood, be called tenderloin)