tennessee: is dry state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school
Weight: 0.64
, florida
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.36
, missouri
Weight: 0.36
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.36
, kentucky
Weight: 0.36
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dry state 1.00
be in state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is dry state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be in state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(kentucky, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is dry state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(missouri, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(missouri, be in state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tennessee, is dry state)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tennessee, be in state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be in state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tennessee, be in state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be in state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, is dry state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(kentucky, is dry state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(missouri, be in state)