tennis ball: be at can full of them

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf ball
Weight: 0.80
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.78
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.77
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cue ball
Weight: 0.41
, tennis
Weight: 0.39
, cotton ball
Weight: 0.37
, plate
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at can full of them 1.00
be at can 0.88
be used to stand on it 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(plate, be used to stand on it)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(plate, be used to stand on it)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plate, be used to stand on it)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tennis ball, be at can full of them)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be at can)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be at can)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tennis ball, be at can)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, be at can)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be at can full of them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be at can full of them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be at can full of them)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plate, be used to stand on it)