tennis ball: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf ball
Weight: 0.80
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.78
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.77
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cue ball
Weight: 0.41
, bowling ball
Weight: 0.40
, ball bearing
Weight: 0.40
, tennis
Weight: 0.39
, cotton ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs teeth 0.92
like dogs is foxes 0.85
go bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ball bearing, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(tennis ball, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(tennis ball, be bad for dogs teeth)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs teeth)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be bad for dogs teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tennis ball, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, go bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tennis ball, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tennis ball, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ball bearing, go bad)