tennis game: be at park

Related concepts

Parents	game Weight: 0.73
Siblings	hockey game Weight: 0.41 , football game Weight: 0.41 , baseball game Weight: 0.41 , soccer ball Weight: 0.39 , table tennis Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at park	1.00
be used to recreation	0.76
be play for recreation	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tennis game, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(tennis game, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(soccer ball, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(tennis game, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(tennis game, be used to recreation)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be used to recreation)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(tennis game, be used to recreation)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(tennis game, be used to recreation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tennis game, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(tennis game, be at park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)