tennis player: advance to final round

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.78
, player
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.42
, hockey player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41
, baseball player
Weight: 0.40
, basketball player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
advance to final round 1.00
win match 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, win match)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(soccer player, win match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soccer player, win match)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tennis player, advance to final round)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tennis player, win match)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tennis player, win match)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, win match)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tennis player, win match)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, advance to final round)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis player, advance to final round)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, advance to final round) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(soccer player, win match)