tennis racket: is damn expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf club
Weight: 0.69
, sport
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tennis ball
Weight: 0.78
, tennis
Weight: 0.38
, table tennis
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37
, badminton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf club, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sport, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf club, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf club, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sport, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf club, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(badminton, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(badminton, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tennis racket, is damn expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tennis racket, is expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tennis racket, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tennis racket, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(golf club, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(badminton, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tennis racket, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(golf club, is expensive)