tennis: be called love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called love 1.00
say love 0.91
has state love 0.86
use word love 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, say love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tennis player, say love)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennis player, say love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tennis, be called love)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tennis, say love)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tennis, say love)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tennis, say love)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tennis, say love)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tennis, use word love)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tennis, has state love)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tennis, use word love)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tennis, use word love)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tennis, use word love)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tennis, has state love)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tennis, has state love)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(tennis, has state love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be called love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tennis, be called love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be called love)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tennis player, say love)