tennis: is score love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is score love 1.00
is score 0.94
score 15 30 40 0.93
score 0.93
score way 0.92
be score way 0.92
keep score 0.91
score system 0.88
be scored with love 40 0.87
be scored love 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tennis, is score love)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tennis, score)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tennis, is score)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tennis, score way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tennis, score)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tennis, is score)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tennis, score way)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(tennis, score)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tennis, is score)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is score)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tennis, score)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tennis, score way)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tennis, score way)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is score love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tennis, is score love)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tennis, is score love)