termite: be vs flying ant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.60
, fungus
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.55
, creature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings aphid
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, ant
Weight: 0.36
, mosquito bite
Weight: 0.36
, beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs flying ant 1.00
be vs ant 0.94
be vs carpenter ant 0.85
differ from ant 0.79
lose to ants 0.77
be different from ants 0.77
be called white ants 0.76
be called ants 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ant, be called ants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ant, be called ants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ant, be called ants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(termite, be vs ant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(termite, differ from ant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(termite, be vs ant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(termite, be vs carpenter ant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(termite, differ from ant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(termite, be different from ants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(termite, be vs carpenter ant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(termite, be called ants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(termite, be vs ant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(termite, be vs carpenter ant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(termite, be different from ants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(termite, lose to ants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(termite, be called ants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(termite, be vs ant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(termite, differ from ant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(termite, be called white ants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(termite, be called white ants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(termite, lose to ants)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(termite, be vs carpenter ant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(termite, lose to ants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(termite, be different from ants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(termite, be called ants)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(termite, be called white ants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(termite, lose to ants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(termite, be called ants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(termite, be different from ants)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(termite, be called white ants)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(termite, differ from ant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(termite, be vs flying ant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(termite, be vs flying ant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ant, be called ants)