texas: compare to other states in union

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to other states in union 1.00
be different from other states 0.85
be different from states 0.83
be bigger than other states 0.80
was admitted to union 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, was admitted to union)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(oklahoma, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, was admitted to union)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(texas, compare to other states in union)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(texas, be different from states)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(texas, be different from other states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(texas, be different from states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(texas, be different from other states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(texas, be different from other states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(texas, be different from states)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(texas, be bigger than other states)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(texas, be bigger than other states)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(texas, be bigger than other states)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(texas, was admitted to union)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(texas, be different from other states)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(texas, was admitted to union)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(texas, was admitted to union)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(texas, be bigger than other states)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(texas, was admitted to union)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(texas, be different from states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(texas, compare to other states in union)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, compare to other states in union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, was admitted to union)