texas: has coast

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
, city
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dallas
Weight: 0.55
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has coast 1.00
has large coast 0.96
be at west coast of usa 0.84
has beach 0.78
be inland from sea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arizona, be inland from sea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(texas, has coast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(arizona, be inland from sea)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arizona, be inland from sea)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(california, has beach)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(georgia, has beach)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(california, has large coast)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(california, be at west coast of usa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arizona, be inland from sea)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(texas, has coast)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(california, has large coast)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(california, has large coast)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(california, be at west coast of usa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(california, be at west coast of usa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(georgia, has beach)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(georgia, has beach)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(california, has beach)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(california, has beach)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(texas, has coast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(texas, has coast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(arizona, be inland from sea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(california, has large coast)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(california, be at west coast of usa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(georgia, has beach)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(california, has beach)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(texas, has coast)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(arizona, be inland from sea)