texas: has rain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has rain 1.00
has most acid rain 0.89
have weather 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(oklahoma, have weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(texas, has rain)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(texas, has most acid rain)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(texas, has most acid rain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(texas, has most acid rain)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(texas, has most acid rain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(texas, have weather)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(texas, have weather)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(texas, have weather)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(texas, have weather)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texas, has rain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(texas, has rain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texas, has rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have weather)