texas: have climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have climate 1.00
have humid climate 0.87
have weather 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(oklahoma, have weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(texas, have climate)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(texas, have humid climate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(texas, have weather)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(texas, have humid climate)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(texas, have weather)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(texas, have weather)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(texas, have humid climate)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(texas, have weather)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(texas, have humid climate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texas, have climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(texas, have climate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texas, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have weather)