texas: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population 1.00
have large population 0.94
have population growth 0.92
have hispanic population 0.85
have large hispanic population 0.85
czech population wise 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(california, have large hispanic population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(texas, have population)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(texas, have large population)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(texas, have population growth)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(texas, have hispanic population)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(texas, have hispanic population)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(texas, have hispanic population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(texas, have hispanic population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(texas, have population growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(texas, have large population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(texas, have large population)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(texas, have population growth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(texas, have large population)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, have population growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(texas, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(texas, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(texas, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(california, have large hispanic population)