:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
is hot |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(arizona, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(texas, is hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nebraska, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(texas, is hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nebraska, is hot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(arizona, is hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(arizona, is hot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(california, is hot)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(arizona, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(texas, is hot)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(texas, is hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(texas, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nebraska, is hot)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(arizona, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(california, is hot)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tennessee, is hot)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nebraska, is hot)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(texas, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(arizona, is hot)