texas: was named 1 st state in tornado deaths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1 st state in tornado deaths 1.00
have more tornado strikes than oklahoma 0.82
get hit most by tornadoes 0.82
have tornadoes 0.80
get many tornadoes 0.80
get tornadoes 0.80
have many tornadoes 0.80
have more tornadoes than oklahoma 0.80
be in tornado alley 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(missouri, get tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(missouri, get many tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, get tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have many tornadoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(missouri, get tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(missouri, get tornadoes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oklahoma, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have tornadoes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oklahoma, get tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, get tornadoes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(missouri, get many tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(missouri, get many tornadoes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oklahoma, have many tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have many tornadoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(texas, have tornadoes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(texas, have tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(texas, be in tornado alley)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(texas, have many tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(texas, get hit most by tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(texas, be in tornado alley)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(texas, have many tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(texas, get hit most by tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(texas, have tornadoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(texas, have tornadoes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(texas, get hit most by tornadoes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(texas, be in tornado alley)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(texas, have many tornadoes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(texas, be in tornado alley)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(texas, have more tornado strikes than oklahoma)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(texas, have many tornadoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(texas, have more tornadoes than oklahoma)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(texas, have more tornadoes than oklahoma)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(texas, get hit most by tornadoes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(texas, have more tornado strikes than oklahoma)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(texas, have more tornadoes than oklahoma)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(texas, have more tornado strikes than oklahoma)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(texas, have more tornadoes than oklahoma)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(texas, have more tornado strikes than oklahoma)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(missouri, get tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(oklahoma, get tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(missouri, get many tornadoes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(texas, was named 1 st state in tornado deaths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have many tornadoes)