textbook: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bible
Weight: 0.63
, math book
Weight: 0.61
, cheque book
Weight: 0.33
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, dissertation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00
seem boring 0.95
is dull 0.87
is useless 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(math book, is boring)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(math book, is dull)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(math book, is useless)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(math book, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(math book, is boring)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(math book, is useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(math book, is useless)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(math book, is dull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(math book, is dull)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(textbook, is boring)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(textbook, seem boring)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(textbook, seem boring)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(textbook, seem boring)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(textbook, seem boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(math book, is boring)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(math book, is dull)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math book, is useless)