thanksgiving: be in rome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents occasion
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.63
, dinner
Weight: 0.63
, holiday
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving day
Weight: 0.39
, remembrance day
Weight: 0.35
, memorial day
Weight: 0.34
, passover
Weight: 0.34
, jubilee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rome 1.00
be in italy 0.79
be on monday of october in canada 0.78
is greece 0.77
be in canada in usa 0.77
be on thursday in canada 0.77
be on second monday of october in canada 0.77
be on monday in canada 0.76
be in usa 0.76
be late in italy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dinner, be late in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(dinner, be late in italy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be late in italy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dinner, be late in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in italy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in usa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be in italy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in canada in usa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be on second monday of october in canada)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be in canada in usa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(thanksgiving, be in italy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be in usa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(thanksgiving, be in canada in usa)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be on second monday of october in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(thanksgiving, be on second monday of october in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in canada in usa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be on second monday of october in canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(thanksgiving, be in usa)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in italy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dinner, be late in italy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dinner, be late in italy)