theory: be vital tools for developmental researchers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vital tools for developmental researchers 1.00
be used in developmental psychology 0.81
be useful in field of child development 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(theory, be useful in field of child development)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be useful in field of child development)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be useful in field of child development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theory, be useful in field of child development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)