theory: pertaining to development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
pertaining to development 1.00
pertaining to policy implementation 0.89
pertaining to criminal policy implementation 0.87
be related 0.80
is related 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(theory, pertaining to development)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(theory, pertaining to criminal policy implementation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, pertaining to criminal policy implementation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, pertaining to criminal policy implementation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(theory, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, is related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(theory, pertaining to criminal policy implementation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(theory, be related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(theory, is related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(theory, is related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(theory, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theory, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(theory, pertaining to development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(theory, pertaining to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(theory, pertaining to development)