there: be a part of canada

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of canada 1.00
be a part of australia 0.87
be a part of ireland 0.81
be a part of quebec 0.81
be a part of france 0.77
be a part of belgium 0.75
be a part of london 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(there, be a part of canada)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(there, be a part of australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of quebec)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of quebec)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(there, be a part of london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(there, be a part of quebec)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(there, be a part of quebec)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(there, be a part of london)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(there, be a part of australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(there, be a part of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(there, be a part of canada)