there: be a part of nebraska

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of nebraska 1.00
be a part of wisconsin 0.85
be a part of michigan 0.85
be a part of minnesota 0.85
be a part of wyoming 0.84
be a part of utah 0.84
be a part of tennessee 0.84
be a part of iowa 0.84
be a part of oklahoma 0.84
be a part of missouri 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(there, be a part of nebraska)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of wisconsin)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(there, be a part of utah)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of michigan)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(there, be a part of tennessee)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of utah)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(there, be a part of michigan)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of tennessee)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(there, be a part of wisconsin)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of oklahoma)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of missouri)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of wisconsin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(there, be a part of missouri)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of michigan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(there, be a part of oklahoma)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of utah)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of tennessee)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of oklahoma)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(there, be a part of missouri)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(there, be a part of wisconsin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(there, be a part of oklahoma)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(there, be a part of michigan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(there, be a part of missouri)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(there, be a part of tennessee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(there, be a part of utah)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(there, be a part of nebraska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(there, be a part of nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(there, be a part of nebraska)