thermal energy: be similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kinetic energy
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.57
, energy
Weight: 0.57
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.38
, solar cell
Weight: 0.34
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, heat pump
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar 1.00
be different 0.80
is different 0.78
be same 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(process, be different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kinetic energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source, be different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(kinetic energy, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kinetic energy, be different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be similar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, is different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(process, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be similar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(process, be different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, is different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(source, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kinetic energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(process, be different)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source, be different)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(kinetic energy, is different)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kinetic energy, be different)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(solar cell, be similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(thermal energy, be similar)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be same)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(thermal energy, be different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be different)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(thermal energy, be same)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be same)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be same)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be similar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, is different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(source, be different)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(process, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(solar cell, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be similar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, is different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(source, be different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(thermal energy, be similar)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(process, be different)