thermostat: fail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heating
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, control
Weight: 0.60
, system
Weight: 0.58
Siblings electric heater
Weight: 0.62
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, cooling device
Weight: 0.34
, dehumidifier
Weight: 0.34
, heat pump
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(system, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(thermostat, fail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(system, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(system, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dehumidifier, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(system, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thermostat, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dehumidifier, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dehumidifier, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(thermostat, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(thermostat, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(system, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dehumidifier, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(thermostat, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(system, fail)