:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(work, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(thesis, is hard)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(work, is hard)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(work, is hard)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is hard)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(thesis, is hard)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(thesis, is hard)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(thesis, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)