they: be called wildcats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called wildcats 1.00
be called anteaters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(they, be called wildcats)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(they, be called anteaters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(they, be called anteaters)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(they, be called anteaters)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(they, be called anteaters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(they, be called wildcats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(they, be called wildcats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(they, be called wildcats)