:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(forearm, zits)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(thigh, zit)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(thigh, zit)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(thigh, zit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(thigh, zit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(thigh, zits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(thigh, zits)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(thigh, zits)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(thigh, zits)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(thigh, has state zit)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(forearm, zits)