think: be used to understand problem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.77
, work
Weight: 0.65
, people
Weight: 0.65
, word
Weight: 0.58
, song
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thought
Weight: 0.38
, remember
Weight: 0.38
, know
Weight: 0.37
, what
Weight: 0.37
, anybody
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to understand problem 1.00
be used to problem solve 0.88
be motivated by solve problem 0.87
solve problem 0.87
causes solve problem 0.87
causes solution to difficult problem 0.85
be at we do not understand 0.84
causes solution to problem 0.83
causes insight to difficult problem 0.83
be used to solve thing 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(think, be used to understand problem)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(think, solve problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(think, be motivated by solve problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(think, causes solve problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(think, be motivated by solve problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(think, causes solve problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(think, be used to solve thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(think, causes solution to problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(think, causes solution to problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(think, be motivated by solve problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(think, solve problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(think, solve problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(think, causes solve problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to solve thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(think, causes solution to problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(think, be used to solve thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(think, solve problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(think, be used to solve thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(think, causes solve problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(think, be motivated by solve problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, causes solution to problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)