thinking: is long periods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.63
, function
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings rationalization
Weight: 0.49
, talking
Weight: 0.35
, thought
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is long periods 1.00
has time periods 0.95
is long periods exhausting 0.91
is periods exhausting 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(thinking, is long periods)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(thinking, has time periods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(thinking, has time periods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(thinking, is long periods exhausting)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(thinking, has time periods)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(thinking, is periods exhausting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(thinking, is periods exhausting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(thinking, is long periods exhausting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thinking, is long periods exhausting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is long periods exhausting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is periods exhausting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(thinking, is periods exhausting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(thinking, has time periods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(thinking, is long periods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(thinking, is long periods)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(thinking, is long periods)