third party: is vote

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.80
, party
Weight: 0.79
, candidate
Weight: 0.69
Siblings green party
Weight: 0.79
, democratic party
Weight: 0.75
, congress
Weight: 0.65
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.64
, time
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vote 1.00
is wasted vote 0.81
win in elections 0.79
be in elections 0.79
lose elections 0.78
lose most elections 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(third party, is vote)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(third party, is vote)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(party, lose elections)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(party, lose most elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(party, lose elections)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(party, lose most elections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(third party, is vote)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(third party, is vote)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(third party, is vote)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(third party, is wasted vote)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(third party, is wasted vote)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(third party, is wasted vote)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose elections)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose most elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(third party, win in elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(third party, be in elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(third party, lose elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(third party, is wasted vote)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, lose elections)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(third party, be in elections)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(third party, lose most elections)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(third party, win in elections)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(third party, be in elections)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(third party, lose most elections)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(third party, win in elections)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, lose elections)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(third party, be in elections)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(third party, lose most elections)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(third party, win in elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(third party, is vote)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(third party, is vote)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(third party, is vote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)